Bearing securities scholars

 Securities and scholars for teaching manners
needs, I often visit Sohu blog securities section. Very happy in this column often see some very high academic standards of conscience and securities scholars insightful article published. For example Week Junsheng, Cao Zhongming, Hsieh c, Wang weight, leatherback sea state, etc., and their common characteristic is the article relatively thorough reasoning, comparison-depth look at the issue, language, civilization, cultivation. the existence of these scholars, is the hope of China's securities market. students to look at some of these articles will benefit.
but, unfortunately, there are some scholars, the lack of security and moral training, the article from its point of view, has the following characteristics: First, superficial analysis, views one-sided, but extremely vain, self-righteous, or conceit, thick skinned, it seems that only he is right, someone else must be wrong; the second is full Fei Qi, Xuefa style, hot-tempered, small-minded, can not tolerate different views; Third, the nature of the poor, investors lose out on the pleasure, profit to investors uncomfortable. If you let these people about government policy, it would be a disaster for investors. For such people the article, you can read, but for the poor style of writing, not learn of.
China's securities market, the majority of scholars to discuss needs. have different views, views is normal, the argument is normal. only different views on the impact each other in order to Flaring thoughts in theory can continue to enriched and deepened. without violating the premise of political principles, in terms of academic research, should be promoted to plug someone else's words way. As for who is right, the majority of investors and theoretical workers have the ability to make their own judgments, we should allow them to make their own judgments.